Administrator's 2015 Performance Evaluation

In January, 2016, the Council discussed the approach it would take to conduct Administrator Selig’s 2015 performance evaluation. Councilors decided to continue with the same process used in recent years in which the Council utilized a one-page evaluation form/matrix outlining key elements of importance and ranking the administrator’s performance (on a scale of 1 to 5) for each element, which included five categories:

1.         Ability to maintain or improve strong relationships;
2.         Financial oversight;
3.         Leadership;
4.         Initiative; and
5.         Other.  

Rankings included:   5=Excellent, 4=Very Good, 3=Good, 2=Acceptable, 1=Unacceptable.

The Matrix and comments provided by Council members are provided below.